As a journalist I have written about social issues and international affairs for the Guardian, the Independent, New Internationalist, Huffington Post, Equal Times and the Big Issue in the North, among other titles. I now work at the University of Leeds as a qualified careers professional, helping international students fulfill their career ambitions
The dispute is one of the largest in China's recent history
Workers at a factory in southern China, which makes shoes for Nike
and Adidas, have entered their second week of industrial action in one of the
largest labour disputes at a single enterprise in recent history.
According to US based China Labor Watch (CLW) more than
30,000 employees have been on strike since 14 April at the Yue Yuen Industrial
(Holdings) Ltd factory
– the world’s largest manufacturer of athletic shoes –
in the city of Dongguan.
Despite threats from the factory’s management that staff
could be fired if they fail to return to work, workers said
industrial action would continue until demands for unpaid social insurance and
the right to pick their own union were met.
“Management is being too forceful about workers returning to
work, saying that beginning on the 24th, if workers swipe their cards and then
leave, they will be punished according to absenteeism rules,” one worker told
US based China Labour Watch (CLW).
“Workers can only carry out a work stoppage sitting at their
positions in the facilities in order to protest and demand a reasonable
response from management to workers’ demands.”
On Thursday, Dongguan City Union released an official document pledging its
support for the election of worker representatives and negotiation between
management and the Yue Yuen staff.
The document also contains official responses to worker
demands from the Bureau of Social Insurance, the Bureau of Human Resources, the
Housing Fund Management Centre, and Yue Yuen factory’s management.
In its statement, the Bureau of Social Insurance explained
that the factory must provide past unpaid social insurance to workers.
However, Yue Yuen management stated that the company
reserved the right to fire workers for three days’ absence from work.
On 22 April, two labour activists, Zhang Zhiru and Lin Dong,
who entered the factory to assist workers, were detained by local authorities.
They are yet to be released.
Kevin Slater, Programme Coordinator for CLW, told Equal
Times that the dispute was symbolic of the changing face of labour rights
in a country which is experiencing growing unrest as economic growth slows:
“The Yue Yuen strike is emblematic of a confluence of
factors that are increasingly defining labour politics in China. Policy changes have made
legally enshrined rights like social insurance more salient for workers.
“At the same time, brand companies are asking supplier
factories to meet evermore stringent price and time demands, to which the
factories ultimately adapt via suppressing labour costs, like social insurance.
The Yue Yuen strike also clarifies the need for effective
organization and representation of workers in the Chinese workplace.”
Hong Kong-based rights group, China Labour Bulletin (CLB),
recorded 202 labour disputes in the country during the first quarter of 2014 –
a year-on-year increase of more than 30 per cent.
Geoff Crothall, Communications Director of CLB, predicts
industrial action will continue to increase in the future as Chinese workers
become more aware of their rights.
“The Yue Yuen strike is important for two reasons: firstly
because of the sheer scale of the workers’ action. Up to 40,000 workers
participated in the strike, making it one of the largest at single enterprise
in recent memory.
“The strike highlights the increasingly important issue of
social insurance benefits. For much of the reform era in China, migrant workers in
particular simply did not have pensions or any kind of social safety net.
“In the last few years, however, workers have become more
aware of their rights to social security and are more determined to claim those
rights, particularly as they get older and start thinking about retirement. The
issue will only grow in importance in the future.”
Most people are able to place a small bet once in a while
without suffering any real consequences beyond losing a tenner. However, for a
small minority, gambling can become a serious addiction with the power to destroy
In the UK, it’s estimated that around 350,000 people suffer from an
addiction to gambling – recently classified as a disorder in the latest edition
of the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM V) – and those numbers
Last week the Guardian hosted a debate in collaboration with
Discuss, where two expert speakers debated whether or not gambling is now out
of control. Here’s what they thought:
If members of the audience were in any doubt about the
potential for gambling to cause harm, few remained unconvinced after hearing
the first speaker, Paul Buck, recount his personal story. Buck who is the
founder of EPIC, a problem gambling consultancy, began his career in retail shortly
after graduating …
(Originally published by the Big Issue in the North)
The family of a 41-year-old nurse from Stockport who died in
2005 are to be granted a fresh inquest following their investigation into the strange
circumstances surrounding her death and relationship with the former head of
ethics of the British Medical Association (BMA).
After an original inquest into the death of Carole Myers
returned an open verdict, the Felstead family obtained her psychiatric and
medical records which revealed she had undergone “recovered memory” therapy
sessions on the NHS from the age of 21.
During these sessions she was given psychotropic drugs and was
encouraged to believe she had been abused by her parents who she alleged were
serial murderers and members of a satanic cult.
Her new memories also included claims that she had been
abused by two members of the Tory cabinet at the Conservative party
Although these allegations were later shown to be false, their
accuracy was never questioned by t…
(Originally published by the Big Issue in the North)
In 2008, 15-year-old Jordan Cunliffe was sentenced to life in prison for murder. Although the judge accepted he was blind and took no part in the violence that led to the victim's death, he was convicted under a controversial law known as joint enterprise. Mischa Wilmers speaks to his mother about the fight for justice and why her campaign for urgent legal reform is gathering momentum. Janet
Cunliffe is sitting on the living room sofa anxiously awaiting her son’s prison
call. “Jordan phones home every day at six,” she says, adding that he rarely talks
to the media and is unlikely to make an exception for me. Suddenly the phone
rings and she answers it. They chat for several minutes before she mentions that
a journalist wants to speak to him. It’s obvious he’s reluctant, but after some
persuasion she hands over the phone.
pleasantries and I ask what life is like in prison. “Boring. Every day is the
same,” he replies. Is…